Leadership: Value vs. volume: Can we pay for quality?
This building pressure can be seen in a series of vignettes. One of those pivotal moments came in September 2009 when a bipartisan group of 28 senators sent a letter to President Obama asking him, as he worked with Congress on reform legislation, to emphasize the need to “realign spending in the Medicare program to focus on providing more value to beneficiaries.” Another moment emerged in summer 2009 when Mayo Clinic, along with several other healthcare organizations, wrote to federal policymakers asking them to reconsider ways to pay hospitals and physicians for value instead of volume. The clinic’s suggestion: Institute a value index that takes quality (e.g., clinical outcomes, safety, or patient satisfaction), divides it by costs, and produces a quotient of value.
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Medicare Opt-Out a Viable Physician Strategy
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'