Hospital receives immunity from disruptive physicians’ claims
A Pennsylvania hospital that revoked the privileges of a physician because of disruptive behavior has immunity from the physician’s claim for damages because the behavior had an effect on patient health and welfare, ruled the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Lawyers involved in the case, Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital, say the ruling reassures hospitals conducting professional reviews that immunity under the Health Care Quality Improvement Immunity Act (HCQIA) applies not only when there are questions of a physician’s clinical competence but also when there are problems with behavior.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- Mapping Out Revenue-Cycle Solutions
- Will Maryland's Rate Shift Send Tremors Around the Country?
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- E-book Revolution Changes, Challenges Healthcare
- ICD-10 Coding Uncovers Higher Rate of Fatal Falls Among Seniors
- How Rivals Built an ACO
- FL Hospital Vendors Sentenced in Bribery Scheme
- Aetna Building National ACO Network
- Medical Boards Step Up Disciplinary Actions

