Hospitals must overcome physician resistance to P4P
Proponents of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs say the benefits include cost reductions, fewer errors, and improvement in overall quality of care. These potential outcomes have led several government agencies-including CMS-to develop their own pay-for-performance initiatives. The benefits and penalties are major incentives for hospitals and physicians to improve care in these categories, says Susan L. Freeman, chief medical officer at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia and a consultant for The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc., in Marblehead, MA. But the P4P forecast isn't all rosy.
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Hospitals Can Become 'Upstreamists'
- 4 Ways to Lower the Cost to Collect from Self-Pay Patients
- House Calls Key to Pioneer ACO Success
- How Telehealth Pays Off for Providers, Patients
- 4 Tips for Managing Employed Physicians
- WellPoint Dominates Nearly Half of Markets, AMA Says
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform
- CMS Offers Some ACOs $114M for 'Upfront' Costs