Hospitals must overcome physician resistance to P4P
Proponents of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs say the benefits include cost reductions, fewer errors, and improvement in overall quality of care. These potential outcomes have led several government agencies-including CMS-to develop their own pay-for-performance initiatives. The benefits and penalties are major incentives for hospitals and physicians to improve care in these categories, says Susan L. Freeman, chief medical officer at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia and a consultant for The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc., in Marblehead, MA. But the P4P forecast isn't all rosy.
- Interventional Radiology No Longer a Sub-Specialty
- NFP Hospitals' Revenue Growth at 'All-Time Low'
- Will More Pioneer ACOs Defect?
- Acute Kidney Injury Gets New Focus
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Transforming Cancer Care
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US