Hospitals must overcome physician resistance to P4P
Proponents of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs say the benefits include cost reductions, fewer errors, and improvement in overall quality of care.
These potential outcomes have led several government agencies-including CMS-to develop their own pay-for-performance initiatives.
The benefits and penalties are major incentives for hospitals and physicians to improve care in these categories, says Susan L. Freeman, chief medical officer at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia and a consultant for The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc., in Marblehead, MA. But the P4P forecast isn't all rosy.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- Mapping Out Revenue-Cycle Solutions
- Will Maryland's Rate Shift Send Tremors Around the Country?
- E-book Revolution Changes, Challenges Healthcare
- How Rivals Built an ACO
- New Facebook Page Gathers Stories of Medical Harm
- ICD-10 Coding Uncovers Higher Rate of Fatal Falls Among Seniors
- FL Hospital Vendors Sentenced in Bribery Scheme
- Health Insurance Exchanges Put Defined Benefits to the Test

