Philadelphia employees have better health coverage - and it costs more
When it comes to health benefits, it's the same old Philadelphia story.
Long relationships between employers and employees coupled with loyalty to tradition - or maybe it's inertia - mean Philadelphia-area employees tend to have better, more expensive coverage than their counterparts around the nation.
"Employers [here] have a more paternalistic approach," said Jennifer Calhoun Mohl, a principal in Mercer L.L.C., a national benefits-consultancy firm that released results of a national survey Wednesday.
Nationally, the cost of health benefits rose 6.9 percent in 2010 to $9,562 per employee, the biggest increase since 2004, according to the survey of 2,836 employers.
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- Carondelet to Pay $35M to Settle Fraud Allegations
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- CA Powers Up $80M HIE to 'Create Value in the Data'