Alegent CEO's Resignation Illustrates Difficulty of Culture Change
As I was preparing to lead the culture panel at HealthLeaders '09 last Friday in Chicago, I heard about the resignation of Wayne Sensor as CEO at Alegent Health in Omaha.
I've known Wayne for about four years, so the news came as a shock, especially since from every angle I've seen him over that time, it always seemed like he was committed to patient power as the key piece of cutting costs and improving quality in healthcare. He's always been a pioneer—from the drive to make healthcare prices transparent to the consumer to building a staff of employed physicians at the health system. Heck, three of the system's hospitals were recently named among the 100 "best value" hospitals. So what gives?
Well, so far, few are talking, including Sensor himself, but the writing on the wall is pretty obvious. Medical staff at two of Alegent's largest hospitals recently revealed a vote of no confidence against him, and that means dollars, ladies and gentlemen. Essentially, powerful physicians on the medical staff were saying with their no confidence votes that unless he was gone, they would henceforth be taking their business elsewhere. I'm told many of them already did that. Sensor offered his resignation, and the board, faced with a physician revolt that in the short term could have eviscerated the health system in favor of its competitors, accepted.
As I took the stage to moderate a panel on the difficulty of culture change in healthcare, the irony couldn't have been more stark. I talked with a good source on the drama the other day. He says the board insists that Sensor's resignation was not related to his drive to employ physicians at the expense of the affiliated medical staff, but let's be honest here: it couldn't have helped.
Everywhere you look, the old medical staff model of healthcare is breaking down. Hospitals, squeezed by reimbursement struggles, are hitting the financial shoals, and they need patients—especially the high-dollar kind whom specialists treat—to fulfill their mission. Employing physicians means their interests are much better aligned with those of the hospital or health system. But employing specialists is where it gets tricky. Independent physicians still wield tremendous power over patient referrals and most importantly, where they perform their high-margin services, not to mention power over the implants and surgical materials that hospitals must buy. No wonder CEOs feel squeezed at both ends.
When you start moving into specialists' space, you're stepping on toes when there's not a population increase to demand a general increase in the number of specialists in a market, my source says.
- Little-Known Medicare Pay Code Change Will Hurt Specialists
- Electronic Medical Records Don't Save Money, Says Study
- What Breast Cancer Screenings Reveal about Cost Control
- Obama Plans to Sign Executive Order to Target Medicare Waste, Fraud
- The Foundation of Quality Is Safety
- House OKs Bill to Stop Medicare Physician Cuts
- Why Do Some Hospitals Successfully Implement EHRs and Others Fail?
- California Grades PPOs, None Receives Four Stars
- New Senate Bill Would Cost $849 Billion Over 10 Years
- Aetna Cutting 625 Jobs, More Expected in 2010

sidelines (11/3/2009 at 1:12 PM)
Funny thing... Didn't the last CEO (before Wayne Sensor)at Alegent get a "vote of no confidence"? Perhaps history is already revealing itself.
bafisher (10/28/2009 at 12:03 AM)
I do not know Alegent or Mr. Sensor. However, I am not sure why Mr. Sensor is being depicted as a pioneer for employing physicians. This is at least the third cycle in the last 20 years of hospitals attempting to control their future by employing physicians.
I have never seen hospitals employing physicians as the mechanism for improving quality of care, Improving service, improving efficiencies, or improving costs. It has always been about guaranteeing referrals and admissions, increasing revenues, and eliminating the need to improve hospital operations and service so as to draw physicians to practice at the hospital.
I happen to believe that the integrated delivery system model is the best model for quality, service, cost, and innovation. But I have only seen that in the physician-governed organizations such as Virgina Mason, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Lahey Clinic, Cleveland, Mayo, etc.
Insight (10/26/2009 at 11:56 AM)
What lead up to Sensor's failure was a clash in value systems... career, success driven...EGO based senior leadership ...making decisions affecting a traditional, structured group of dedicated physicians and employees. In the end, both physicians and employees saw through the EGO driven decisions and felt they were losing the core values of both their Catholic and Luthern founding hospitals. The Physicians and Board did the right thing, it was not just about a strategy of physician employment versus private practive, it was about eliminating ego driven manipulative leadership.