Defensive Medicine?
Qualify for a free subscription to HealthLeaders magazine.
Some hospital leaders are concerned that CMS is moving too fast with never events.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' newest proposed list of never events for which hospitals will not receive payment has left some facilities' senior leaders wondering: How exactly do you guard against Legionnaires' disease and delirium?
In April, CMS released the nine-item list that includes those two conditions, surgical-site infections following certain elective procedures, and Clostridium difficile-associated disease, among others. The list is the second round of never events offered by CMS in as many years. Last year's list, which takes effect Oct. 1, includes preventable events like objects left in patients during surgery, blood incompatibility, pressure ulcers, and hospital-acquired injuries. CMS will issue a final rule on or before Aug. 1 on the proposed additions.
The latest list has plenty of healthcare leaders concerned. Bob Wachter, MD, chief of the division of hospital medicine and the medical service at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, and professor and associate chair of the university's department of medicine, contends this latest list would create a new species of "defensive medicine" in which facilities will be forced to focus more on protecting themselves than improving quality. Wachter specifically worries about what he perceives to be a sense of unfairness in the second list—he wonders if CMS' list is really about patient safety or a way to save money. Additionally, Wachter says the never events will also create waste for hospitals trying to protect themselves and could sap the enthusiasm of patient safety and quality people.
"It's going to lead at best to wasteful spending and at worst to clinically inappropriate care to make sure that [the patient's] chart looks good," says Wachter.
Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and patient safety policy at the American Hospital Association, says a number of logistical, coding, and management challenges lie ahead with the new list. In some areas, there is no clear code; what's more, some conditions are not listed in medical records, and hospitals will have to work closer with other facilities, including nursing homes, to reduce incidents coming from outside facilities, she says. "It speaks to this notion that there is a growing expectation for hospitals to reach outside their four walls and work more broadly with the community."
- 10 Major Changes to Health Reform in House's Reconciliation Bill
- Cardiology Group Fights Medicare Pay Cuts by Offering Concierge Services
- Where Have All the CEOs Gone?
- Primary Care is Unappealing to Many Medical Students
- Match Day a Reminder of Primary Care's Struggles
- 11 Health Leaders React to House Passing Health Reform
- Can 'Deadly Deliveries' Be a Wake-Up Call to Physicians, Hospitals?
- CBO: Latest Health Reform Bill Would Cost $940 Billion
- Ten Ways to Increase Nurses' Time at the Bedside
- Benchmarking for Beleaguered Budgets

jelam4822 (8/15/2008 at 9:39 AM)
I agree with Dr. Wachter. CMS focus appears to have shifted to saving dollars as opposed to maintaining patient safety. "Never events" meaning seems to be changing from 'never happening' to 'never having to pay for it/them'. A much more incentivising approach would be to pay a lower rate than not paying at all. Also, can you spell "cherry-picking" or "profiling"? Seems like such methods could easily become factors in making treatment and/or admission decisions. CMS would do well to give more thought to its decision in this case. Like death and taxes, some things are simply not avoidable in all situations.