South Dakota urology clinic: Dismiss Iowans' suit
AP/Chicago Tribune, June 23, 2009
Lawyers for a South Dakota urology clinic have asked a judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by five Iowans who might have been exposed to blood-borne infections. State health officials warned patients in April that there was a risk of infection because some medical equipment at the clinic was being reused. Five former patients from Iowa sued the clinic for emotional distress even though they were never exposed to a virus or infection. The clinic's attorneys argued in their motion to dismiss that exposure was needed before most courts would allow the patients to sue.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- CMS Reveals Central Line Infection Rates, Finally
- Keeping Readmission Rates Low with Treatment Guidelines
- 5010 Logjam Means No Pay for Physicians
- Leading Change is Tough from the Back of a Limo
- Medicare Physician Payment Rule Factors in GPCI
- Engineering a High-Performance Emergency Department
- Getting to the Heart of Cardiology Alignment
- Feds Release Final Rules on Health Plan Language
- Parkland Keeping Consultant's Analysis Under Wraps
- What to do with an empty hospital?

