Doctor Says New Yorker Used Slanted Stats Against McAllen, TX
James Stewart is an internist in McAllen, TX, a rapidly growing city just a few miles from Mexico, far south of where the border lies in most of the rest of the U.S.
But when he woke up one morning a few weeks ago, his life and that of many other health providers with whom he works had changed. Suddenly they were in the national spotlight of the health reform debate, and not in a good way. Even President Barack Obama was pointing to McAllen as an example of how not to provide healthcare.
"We were shocked," Stewart said.
Thousands of miles away, writer and Harvard surgeon Atul Gawande had used the Dartmouth Atlas, a compendium of Medicare statistics, to accuse McAllen of providing too much expensive medicine, implying much of it is unnecessary, at the expense of the federal government. He referred to some of the doctors practicing in McAllen as "entrepreneurial," and echoed that for many, medicine had become like another business run by people interested mainly in profits.
And he did it in The New Yorker magazine, in an article entitled "The Cost Conundrum," which the White House has classified has required reading or those in the health reform debate.
"I am not normally a conspiracy theorist," Stewart said in an interview this week.
But in researching and writing his article, Stewart says, Gawande "totally brushed off the poverty we live with here" and the fact that by the time many people get to a health provider, they are diabetic, morbidly obese, have some degree of organ failure, and in some cases have their first medical encounter in an emergency room.
The thought has crossed his mind that Gawande had an agenda from the start, "motivated by reasons I don't pretend to understand."
Stewart characterized the article as being "intellectually dishonest" and says it did not take into consideration the essential fact that makes providing healthcare in McAllen a lot different than it is in Boston.
Gawande, Stewart says, should have run some risk adjustment calculations for that.
"How did we get in there (The New Yorker) this way when we have 30% of our population with no resources, and so many don't even qualify for Medicaid," he said during an interview yesterday.
Stewart and many of his fellow practitioners from McAllen and surrounding towns joined the Texas Medical Association for a visit to Washington, D.C. this week. They're holding meetings with the Border Health Caucus in an effort to persuade policy makers that there is a much more accurate story about what's wrong with healthcare in the U.S., one told with a visit to south Texas.
Gawande neglected to take into account the fact that hospitals in McAllen and many in the larger county of Hidalgo receive a lot of federal disproportionate share money because of the high number of uninsured, many of them undocumented immigrants.
- Sebelius Lashes Out at Anthem for Premium Increases
- Nurse Anesthetists Say They Practice Safely Without Physician Supervision
- 10 Ways to Improve Handoffs in Your Hospital
- There are Big Bucks in Better Patient Flow
- Doctors Sue To Stop Unsupervised Nurse Anesthetists from Administering Anesthesia
- Can Nurses Drive Health Reform?
- Expectant Moms, The White House is Calling
- CT Hospital was Prepared for Power Plant Explosion
- Texas nurse to stand trial for reporting doctor
- HIPAA Harm Threshold Works, Say Providers

gdesanto (6/29/2009 at 6:28 PM)
I read your article with interest. I would also like to say that the Mayo Clinic references also are not based acurately on the facts. I am physician in Scottsdale, Az, but I grew up in Rochester, MN and my father was a doctor at Mayo for 37 years. The statistics used are from Olmsted County where the Mayo Clinic resides. Just as Dr. Stewart states, selection is everything. The people in Olmsted County, a farming community and medical community are inherently low utilizers. There is a low unemployment rate and subsequently low medicaid population. There are virtually no illegal immigrants. The community is generally very healthy. Mayo inherently charges much higher rates than the community physicians. In the locales that they reside in and therefore very few insurance plans allow their local patients to go there. This is the same in Scottsdale and Jacksonville. It would be very interesting for someone to compare average reimbursement rates for common procedures with Mayo vs non Mayo patients. I suspect Mayo collects far more per patient, since patients opt to pay out of network rates and our responsible for much more of the bill. Thus, the Olmsted County medicaid/medicare utilization rates should not extrapolate directly to the Mayo Clinic.
Jay S. Herron (6/26/2009 at 2:42 PM)
Foundational to this discussion which is not being discussed is the love/hate relationship governmental regulation has created between hospitals and doctors out of the fear/concern collaboration will result in treatment abuse and the over use of "medical" services. As Dr. Stewart outlines, they have many societal factors contributing to the health status of McAllen residents. But what is the medical community doing to address these conditions other than the current treatment issues? I suspect physicians don't view it as their issue and hospitals don't treat people clinicians do. Thus the gap.
mbartk (6/26/2009 at 11:56 AM)
The article in question did not say that sick individuals should not be treated. The author merely pointed out that a similar border town treated individuals at a much lower cost. Why so defensive? You can't resolve a problem by not looking at it from every angle. And why are you assuming that Boston doesn't have its share of train wrecks in the ER?? If we don't find a way to control costs there won't be any healthcare in McAllen or anywhere else. You are either part of the problem or part of the solution.