Alegent CEO's Resignation Illustrates Difficulty of Culture Change
Hospitals and health systems held up in the healthcare reform debate as examples of cutting waste and unnecessary duplication of services, not to mention coordination of care, don't have this vexing medical staff problem. Why? A big reason is that they employ their physicians, and as salaried employees, those physicians don't have economic incentives that are contrary to the hospital's. With the medical staff model, they can take their patients and go elsewhere on a moment's notice if their demands aren't being met to their satisfaction. In Alegent's case, they did just that.
So you alienate independent specialists at your own peril. Sensor apparently alienated them once too often. Managing a transition from affiliated to employed physicians is filled with land mines, especially when you are hiring physicians to perform the same work that referring physicians do. According to published reports, many of these physicians felt left out of decision-making by Alegent administrators, and felt the system was moving toward a system where it used primarily its own employed physicians.
I'm not privy to conversations between leadership and the medical staff at Alegent, but hasn't this strategy been obvious for a few years now? Regardless, the fact remains that transforming those organizations into employed physician shops is extremely difficult, even with the strident support of the board, which Sensor apparently did not have.
At every step of his four-year tenure, Sensor has been following a game plan to which many of the most innovative hospital CEOs I've ever met have increasingly turned. Does that mean he wasn't alienating a key constituency? No. Does it mean he didn't make some tactical mistakes? No. Does it mean the strategy is poor? Absolutely not.
Assuming the board's decision to accept his resignation is based on the physician employment question, does this put Alegent on the wrong side of history? Only time will tell, but statistics aren't on their side, long term. Many physicians coming out of medical school today want to be employed by a hospital or health system. Why? It focuses them more on taking care of patients and takes them out of running a business—not the reason most of them went to medical school in the first place.
But I, and many others, including those interested in taking perverse incentives out of healthcare, feel that Alegent's board strategy will end up penny wise—and pound foolish. I'd love to hear whether or not you agree.
Philip Betbeze is a senior leadership editor with HealthLeaders Media. He can be reached at pbetbeze@healthleadersmedia.com.
- 10 Major Changes to Health Reform in House's Reconciliation Bill
- Cardiology Group Fights Medicare Pay Cuts by Offering Concierge Services
- Primary Care is Unappealing to Many Medical Students
- Match Day a Reminder of Primary Care's Struggles
- Where Have All the CEOs Gone?
- Can 'Deadly Deliveries' Be a Wake-Up Call to Physicians, Hospitals?
- CBO: Latest Health Reform Bill Would Cost $940 Billion
- 3 Lessons U.S. Healthcare Can Learn from France to Cut Infections
- Physicians Generate $1.5M Annually for Their Hospitals, Says Survey
- Ten Ways to Increase Nurses' Time at the Bedside

sidelines (11/3/2009 at 1:12 PM)
Funny thing... Didn't the last CEO (before Wayne Sensor)at Alegent get a "vote of no confidence"? Perhaps history is already revealing itself.
bafisher (10/28/2009 at 12:03 AM)
I do not know Alegent or Mr. Sensor. However, I am not sure why Mr. Sensor is being depicted as a pioneer for employing physicians. This is at least the third cycle in the last 20 years of hospitals attempting to control their future by employing physicians.
I have never seen hospitals employing physicians as the mechanism for improving quality of care, Improving service, improving efficiencies, or improving costs. It has always been about guaranteeing referrals and admissions, increasing revenues, and eliminating the need to improve hospital operations and service so as to draw physicians to practice at the hospital.
I happen to believe that the integrated delivery system model is the best model for quality, service, cost, and innovation. But I have only seen that in the physician-governed organizations such as Virgina Mason, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Lahey Clinic, Cleveland, Mayo, etc.
Insight (10/26/2009 at 11:56 AM)
What lead up to Sensor's failure was a clash in value systems... career, success driven...EGO based senior leadership ...making decisions affecting a traditional, structured group of dedicated physicians and employees. In the end, both physicians and employees saw through the EGO driven decisions and felt they were losing the core values of both their Catholic and Luthern founding hospitals. The Physicians and Board did the right thing, it was not just about a strategy of physician employment versus private practive, it was about eliminating ego driven manipulative leadership.