MACs vs. RACs: Could Competition Mean More Bad News for Providers?
What's the difference between a MAC and a RAC?
When it comes to protecting Medicare dollars, they share the responsibility of ensuring healthcare providers are paid correctly for services provided, and both conduct audits to help ensure as much.
But once a MAC audits a service, a RAC cannot. And vice versa. So, does that mean there might be a little friendly competition between them?
Deborah K. Hale, CCS, president and CEO of Administrative Consultant Service, LLC, who spoke during the August 13 audio conference, "Inpatient vs. Observation Service: Level of Care Compliance in a Challenging Regulatory Environment," said she's seeing a little bit of competition between MACs and RACs across the country. "We'll have to see how this pans out," she said. "But since those agencies do have the same responsibility, we may see more activity from the MACs than we do from the RACs."
TrailBlazer, a MAC for Hale's home state of Oklahoma, conducted an audit of 250 inpatient discharges for MS-DRG 247 (the DRG for coronary artery drug-eluting stent without a secondary diagnosis that counts as a major complication/comorbidity), according to a TrailBlazer Job Aid.
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- Hospital M&A Volume Up, Value Down in 3Q
- Small Doesn't Mean Doomed