3 Bills That Could Bury Your Hospital's Bottom Line
What's happening in Washington with healthcare reform is laughable in the world of business. Well, laughable may not be apropos as so many people's livelihoods and well-being are at stake. Still, it would be preposterous for a company to inform its top employees that they are receiving a 21% pay cut, not because they are doing a lousy job, but because the bean counters used the wrong formula to calculate their salaries. It wouldn't happen. That company would be the laughing stock on Wall Street.
Instead the accountants would fix the formula that was used, perhaps explain the situation to the employees as a "loss" and find another way to make up the difference. Yet, it seems the government cannot follow the same basic guidelines that any first year accountant would apply: when your numbers don't work because the formula you're using is wrong and outdated, fix the formula, and then address how to correct the loss (and do it the first year, not seven years later).
This brings me to last week's episode of the Medicare saga, in which bill S. 1776 (Medicare Physician Fairness Act of 2009) was swiftly introduced by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) in the hopes that it would waylay the 21% Medicare reimbursement cuts scheduled to take effect next year for physicians.
Everyone agrees that doctors are doing a great job getting people well, but they just don't all agree if it's fair to pay them the right amount to cover the cost of doing the work. In fact they think they should get paid less than they did last year. Nevertheless, the bill failed. Not to fret the reimbursement cuts are still in limbo. Why? S. 1776 was just the annual mad-dash to block the reimbursement cuts from taking place, but it's not the only bill in the works that could stop the cuts, and it was really just muddying the waters.
Look for politicians to spend the next couple of weeks debating three bills that will likely have a far greater impact on hospital bottom lines, and healthcare overall. I caution you not to get distracted by any of the other bills on this matter. At this stage many of them lack the teeth and clout to go far. For now the most pressing pieces that will impact hospital administrators and boards are:
- S.1796—the Baucus Bill, formally called America's Healthy Future Act of 2009
- H.R. 3200—the Tri-Committee Bill (sometimes called the Kennedy-Dodd Bill), formally called the Affordable Healthcare Choices Act
- S. 1679—the Affordable Health Choices Act, which was approved by Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee's (HELP) on July 15.
The Senate reconciliation process is ongoing among select members of the Finance and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committees and they are reviewing these bills behind closed doors in an attempt to create what I like to call the "healthcare hybrid." Expect to see the fruits of their labor over the next couple of weeks. It's hard to say what intoxicating blend might result from this review, but historically speaking it's likely that a 21% reimbursement cut for next year won't take place (though that doesn't mean a smaller cut won't take effect). Plus you should anticipate a heady dose of health insurance coverage changes—translation, your payer contracts will be adjusted eventually and probably not in your favor.
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives