Raking In Rebound: 80% of Hospitals in the Black
This year, as I bagged seemingly thousands of pounds of multi-colored leaves, it occurred to me that this is only the precursor to the real work. After all my leaves are all cleared away, I have back-breaking snow shoveling to look forward to.
That's when it hit me, raking is what hospital CFOs have been doing the last two years to get their financial yards in order (and things are starting to look decent), but with a host of other challenges ahead, including healthcare reform, it looks like the forecast is calling for snow, so CFOs had better prepare to start shoveling.
I'll explain, but first there is some good financial news for hospitals I want to share. You see, hospitals have been diligently analyzing areas of overspending these many months and your efforts are paying off; 80% of all hospitals are back in the black, according to a research paper Hospitals Continue Financial Recovery released today from The Center for Healthcare Improvement(CHI), a division of Thomson Reuters.
There's more good news: large community hospitals which were hit hardest by the recession—in Q4 2008 nearly 60% of large hospitals reported negative total margins—improved drastically, and now only 8% of facilities are in the red as of Q2 2009, the CHI report notes.
"Many hospitals have recovered to prerecession levels [for total margins]," says Gary Pickens, PhD, CHI Chief Research Officer and coauthor of the paper, which surveyed over 500 hospitals of various size and orientation.
There are a variety of ways CFOs could've tackled their market losses, including reduced salaries or reduced staff per bed, but for the most part that isn't the direction they pursued. The survey shows that FTE salary expenses actually rose by 3%-4% and only a small number of nonclinical contract labor declined. Where did the cost savings come from then?
"[Hospitals] reduced labor expense per discharge by reducing the length of stay; quite simply they put more patients through," Pickens says.
Kudos to all the hospital number-crunchers; your efforts paid off.
Forecast Calls for Snow
Alas, while the CHI findings certainly are very positive news, as I said at the beginning of this column, it's only the first part of the "yard clean up." It's about to snow and there is a slippery sidewalk and driveway you'll have to shovel clear.
I don't like pointing out the unpleasant truth, but the fact remains that many hospitals are still dealing with some seriously bad credit, and let's not forget that healthcare reform, in whatever form, will have a serious impact on the bottom line.
But first, many hospitals have to get their credit back up to snuff. Standard and Poor's July 2009 Ratings Roundup: Criteria-Related Reviews Kept U.S. Public Finance Rating Actions On A Positive Trend In The Second Quarter shows the negative rating trend persisting in Q2 2009 with 22 downgrades and five upgrades.
"Downgrades were slightly more prevalent among higher-rated credits; 56% of these occurred in the medium-to-high investment-grade categories and the remaining 44% were in the low investment-grade or speculative-grade categories," the S&P states. That's not good, at all.
- 'Mega Boards' Could be Rural Healthcare Disruptor
- 1 in 5 Eligible Hospitals Penalized for HACs
- HL20: Rebecca Katz—Cooking Up Sustainable Nourishment
- Meaningful Use Payment Adjustments Begin
- HL20: Peter Semczuk, DDS, MPH—Taking on the Big Challenges
- PA hospital to pay $662,000 to settle Medicare fraud case
- Supreme Court to hear Obamacare subsidy challenge in March
- Dr. Oz gets fact-checked and the results aren't pretty
- How the high cost of medical care is affecting Americans
- HL20: Lee Aase—Who's Behind @MayoClinic