Are Hospitals Illegally Charging the Uninsured Too Much?
Many California hospitals may be skirting state laws that require them to disclose prices of procedures when requested by patients, according to a new study by Rand Health.
"Our findings raise questions about the effectiveness of California laws that are designed to help uninsured patients shop for medical care and protect themselves from being charged excessive prices," wrote the author of the paper, Ateev Mehrotra, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and a Rand policy analyst.
"Current California legislation fails to meet its objective of enabling uninsured patients to compare prices for hospital-based healthcare services," the authors concluded.
The researchers conducted their study by posing as a fictional, uninsured, low-income patient who sent letters requesting price quotes from 353 acute care hospitals for one of three common elective procedures. However, the authors said they received responses from less than one-third. The procedures were a laparoscopic gallbladder removal, a hysterectomy, and a routine screening colonography.
"Just 28% of the hospitals responded . . . and the responses varied widely in content and price," the authors said in a statement. "Most included a price quote for hospital services only, the remainder included both hospital and physician costs or did not specify what was covered."
Mehrotra wrote in an e-mail yesterday that "the hospitals that did not respond were breaking the law."
Of the 98 responses, 15 did not provide a quote and instead asked for more information, such as the billing code; 55 provided a price estimate for hospital services only; 10 included both physician and hospital services; and 18 did not specify what was covered, the researchers wrote.
Two-thirds of the prices quoted by those hospitals exceeded the median price that Medicare reimburses hospitals for each of these procedures.
Mehrotra said the study is the first peer-reviewed effort to review the state's price transparency law, adding the findings have implications for more than 30 other states that have similar laws requiring hospital price transparency to avoid "price gouging" the uninsured.
Brown University contributed to the report, which is published online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. Rand Health is a division of the Rand Corp.
Jan Emerson, spokeswoman for the California Hospital Association, heatedly disputes the findings, saying the study "is deeply flawed" because the authors have incorrectly interpreted the law.
"The law is geared to address a specific patient's financial situation and the patient must first apply for the program and provide the hospital with documented evidence of their financial situation," she says "AB 1045 does require hospitals upon request to provide an estimate of costs for a specific procedure or service, but that estimate is based on the hospital's chargemaster.
"Hospitals do not provide estimates based on discounted fees because the discounts are only applicable to patients who meet specific financial criteria," she said.
Emerson adds the study unfairly criticizes hospitals for not including physician fees in their estimates. "But hospitals don't bill for physician services—this is prohibited under state law."
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Antibiotic Overuse a 'Huge Threat' to Patient Safety, Says CDC
- Carondelet to Pay $35M to Settle Fraud Allegations
- CHS Hacked, 4.5M Patient Records Compromised