Two Ways the Senate Bill Will Pay for Healthcare Reform
While discussion in the Senate during the past few days has focused on how health insurance premiums will be impacted under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, another area expected to gets its fair share of attention on the Senate floor is how the $848 billion reform bill—through savings and taxes—will be paid for over the next decade.
Here is how the bill would pay for health reform:
Medicare and Medicaid Savings
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in its Nov. 18 analysis of the Senate reform bill, estimated that making numerous changes to payment rates related to Medicare, Medicaid, and associated programs, could reduce direct spending by $491 billion over the 2010-2019 period. This would happen by:
- Making permanent reductions in annual updates to Medicare’s payment rates for most services in the fee for service sector (other than physicians’ services). This would yield budgetary savings of about $192 billion over 10 years.
- Setting payment rates in the Medicare Advantage program on the basis of the average of the bids submitted by Medicare Advantage plans in each market. This could yield savings of about $118 billion over the 10-year period.
To address the concern and criticism of cutting Medicare Advantage, the Senate Finance Committee issued a brief on the topic on Tuesday—saying that the Senate bill cuts down on overpayments—not benefits. It said that the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) had determined that Medicare was paying approximately $12 billion more annually for beneficiaries enrolled in private Medicare Advantage plans than if they were in traditional Medicare.
A number of taxes have been added to the proposed Senate bill. The one receiving the greatest attention has been the so-called "Cadillac" tax that would impose an excise tax on insurers of employer sponsored health plans with aggregate values that exceed $8,500 for individual coverage and $23,000 for family coverage, effective January 2013.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement