Massachusetts Investigating Wide Disparities in Hospital, Provider Reimbursements
Health insurers told a Massachusetts agency examining rising healthcare costs that a state trend toward "providing care in more expensive settings" is the primary driver of increasing health costs.
Eric H. Schultz, president and CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, submitted testimony before the Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy hearing on Tuesday that stated some physicians and hospitals are paid upward of 300% to 400% higher for some services compared to others.
"The variations in overall reimbursement to hospitals can also be as high as 300%, but the difference when comparing facility inpatient rates or outpatient rates can be as much as 300% to 400%," Schultz said in a written statement. "The difference in rates between the lowest reimbursed physicians and the highest can be as much as 300% for the same services. Some physician and hospital networks are paid well in excess of 200% of Medicare."
"As has been highlighted in the reports issued by the division and the Attorney General's Office in preparation for these hearings," Schultz stated, "increasing reimbursement rates demanded by providers for medical services, and the trend toward providing care in more expensive settings are the primary drivers of increasing healthcare costs, increases that are reflected in higher premiums."
In written testimony, the Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization also spoke of disparities in costs. "Our efforts to contain unit cost increases have been constrained by provider market leverage driven by system size, reputation, service uniqueness, and geographic location," the company stated. "Our efforts also have been constrained by market preferences dictating that we maintain as broad a provider network as possible."
The insurers said in testimony their findings mirrored a Massachusetts' Attorney General's Office investigation that focused on how higher reimbursement rates were generated by the most powerful hospitals, not necessarily those providing the best care. The division is continuing hearings Thursday and Friday.
"The division's findings generally are consistent with Tufts Health Plan's experience, particularly with regard to the impact of unit cost inflation on health insurance premium increases," Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization stated.
Attorney General Martha Coakley, who has conducted a yearlong investigation into the healthcare cost increases, presented her findings to the division, reiterating statements she made in a preliminary report in January.
"We found that healthcare costs most closely correlated the market leverage of hospitals and physician groups, rather than other issues that we would expect—like quality of care or patient population, " Coakley said in a statement.
"Prices paid by health insurance companies to hospitals and physician groups vary significantly within the same geographic area and among providers offering similar levels of service, and price variations for hospitals and physicians are not explained by quality of care and similar factors," the attorney general said in a statement.
- 'Onboard' New Nurses to Prevent Them from Jumping Ship
- Executives Gone Wild: Paying the Price for Personal Conduct
- 3 Tips For HIPAA Privacy Officers
- Urgent Care Could Replace ED For Some Patients, Report Says
- Tort Reform's Impact on Lowering Medical Malpractice Litigation Costs May Be Limited
- 6 Strategies for Lowering Bad-Debt Exposure
- OIG Warns of Pre-Authorization Violations
- Competitors Lead Hospital's Financial Turnaround
- CMS Hears Provider Concerns Over 'Observation' Status
- AG Raps BIDMC Execs, Board for Levy's Lapses

mikeb (3/18/2010 at 11:27 AM)
There is huge disparity in physician reimbursement not only by hospital but by specialty. I do not understand why PCPs who are reimbursed 105% of Medicare or less don't complain when hospital based providers (ER docs, anesthesia, radiologists, pathologists)are getting 250% of Medicare or more?I am speaking of commercial business only. There is huge disparities in physician reimbursement that everyone knows about but says nothing. Also the current method of physician reimbursement, fee for service, encourages over utilization and "creative billing".
Frank Stevens (3/17/2010 at 9:06 PM)
No kidding. When are people going to talk about how much the Docs are making. These physician groups are making a fortune. I was charge $1200 for 10 minutes worth of time foe an exam . What a scam