NH Hospitals Brace for Lower Payments for Medicaid Patients
A repayment formula approved this week by a New Hampshire legislative committee for uncompensated care may be too low to accurately reflect what hospitals in the state spend on uninsured and Medicaid patients. Nine community and inpatient acute rehabilitation hospitals in the state could lose more than $14 million in funding.
"That's simply wrong and will end up costing those of us with private insurance more through higher insurance premiums as those costs get shifted to cover these losses," the New Hampshire Hospital Association (NHHA) said. "This is an unfortunate outcome for hospitals, their patients and the communities they serve."
Some hospitals in the state that provide uncompensated care may receive Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) adjustment payments that are significantly lower, officials with NHHA said, after the state Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) approved a recommendation by the Joint Legislative Fiscal Committee to reformulate its repayment structure.
The move was a response to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which had questioned whether the state's process reflected the true uncompensated care costs being incurred by hospitals.
DSH adjustment payments, according to CMS, provide assistance to hospitals that serve a disproportionate number of poor patients. Hospitals receive an annual allotment to cover the costs of providing care to low-income patients who do not have other insurance, such as Medicare, Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program. The annual payment, established by the federal government, includes stipulations that DSH payments to individual hospitals must not exceed the uncompensated costs.
Historically, the state has put 100 percent of the federal matching dollars into the General Fund. "New Hampshire's DSH program was never really intended to do much more than use this federal money to help fund other parts of the state government and to balance the budget," the NHHA said.
The legislative committee's response to the federal directive may still mean funds are diverted to the state's General Fund to support other programs, not uncompensated care, NHHA President Steve Ahnen, said. And, the committee's approval may still face some challenges, he noted, "but as the Health and Human Services Commissioner said [Tuesday], the state needs to find a way to fix this on a long-term basis."
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement