How Hospitals Can Recoup Revenue on Resident-rendered Services
Trainees perform a significant number of unsupervised procedures on patients with private insurance but are prohibited from billing for those services. And that represents a significant amount of lost income for teaching institutions. This is the conclusion reached by the authors of a study published in The Journal of Trauma -- Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.
Billing private insurers for these services might help offset the costs of graduate medical education, the authors suggest.
Medicare does not let residents and fellows bill for services, and for good reason: Medicare already supplements hospitals via medical education funds. Reimbursement for trainee services would amount to double billing, explains the lead author, Ara J. Feinstein, MD, MPH, a trauma surgeon who is clinical assistant professor and surgical clerkship director at University of Arizona College of Medicine in Phoenix.
The problem, according to the authors is this: Private insurance companies benefit financially from Medicare billing regulations without contributing to the expense of education.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- A Fresh Look at End-of-Life Care