Couple trying to change law on who should pay for hospital-acquired infection treatment
The Daily Progress, February 14, 2012
In late November, John Muncie underwent a laminectomy, a procedure that enlarges the spinal canal to relieve pressure on the spinal column or pinched nerves. A month later, he returned to the hospital because he was infected with one or more bacteria during the surgery. He spent the next 12 days fighting for his life. "If you broke it, you fix it, and you pay for it," his wife says. "We need [hospitals] to have an incentive to lower the infection rate ... Until it cuts into their profit margins, there's no real incentive for them to."
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Less Blood Testing for Some Surgeries Safe, Cost Effective
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Lower ED Margins Demand a Better Strategy
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
