Gainsharing and Shared Savings Continue to Spark Interest
Though the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may stay or go this month, proven cost reduction strategies never die. Two examples are gainsharing and shared savings, which predate the latest attempt at healthcare reform and in fact have had new life breathed into them.
Gainsharing allows hospitals and physicians to collaborate and share cost savings as a reward for quality and efficiency improvements. The definition of shared savings is essentially the same. The difference is that gainsharing targets device and supply usage within a specific service line (e.g., orthopedics or cardiology) whereas shared savings targets specific patient populations (e.g., diabetics or asthmatics).
Gainsharing has gotten a bad rap, however. "Gainsharing is difficult and technically it is not legal, though the OIG [Office of Inspector General at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] has granted waivers. … I think people are still uncomfortable with the waivers, which is why gainsharing has struggled," says Robert Glenning, executive vice president and CFO at the 775-bed Hackensack (NJ) University Medical Center.
The problem for gainsharing is that OIG ruled that such arrangements violate the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute. Nevertheless, gainsharing programs have demonstrated cost savings and quality results, so in 2005 OIG began granting waivers to allow these arrangements.
- CMS to Speak with ICD-10 Backers Tuesday
- Boston Marathon Bombing Yields Lessons for Hospitals
- Governor Details Healthcare Payment Reform Path in Arkansas
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- MetroHealth Revs Its Population Health Engine
- Medicare Opt-Out a Viable Physician Strategy
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- HIX Success Could Generate Add-On Revenue for CT