Reducing 30-day Readmissions, Simply
Beginning in October, hospitals and health systems will feel the sting of Medicare penalties for high 30-day readmission rates in three disease categories: heart attacks, heart failure, and pneumonia. If you're waiting for the Supreme Court to change all that with the stroke of a pen, you're likely to be out of luck. The court's impact on those penalties may be limited.
Whatever the court decides about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, you'll get further in your fiscal planning and save more dollars by implementing a simple, yet effective care coordination program like the one used by McKay-Dee Hospital in Ogden, Utah.
Prevent 30-Day Readmissions
June 27, 2012, 1:00-2:30 p.m. (EST)
Join HealthLeaders Media for readmissions approaches that work—from risk identification and communication, to developing reduction models, standardized care, and strategies for funding initiatives and patient engagement.
Sure, Washington, D.C. is abuzz with legislators, attorneys, healthcare professionals, and media all clamoring for the Supreme Court's ruling, which is expected any day now. But I feel certain that none of the likely judicial outcomes will put an end to the need to reduce 30-day readmission rates.
Simply put, we're moving away from fee-for-service and toward fee-for-value regardless of the Supreme Court decision, so hospitals and health systems will need to do more than ever to care for the "whole" patient.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows