Opinion: A moderate ruling with risks ahead
The New York Times, June 29, 2012
There is no underestimating the importance of the Supreme Court decision upholding most of the health reform law—politically, constitutionally and in terms of its practical effects on the nation and the economy. These effects were clear from the moment the decision was announced Thursday morning, but the constitutional picture was more complex. The major exception to the strong legal endorsement of the law involves Medicaid. We disagreed with the court's legal reasoning on this point and believe that without the possibility of withdrawing federal funds, the reform law may fall short of ensuring near-universal coverage.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Less Blood Testing for Some Surgeries Safe, Cost Effective
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Lower ED Margins Demand a Better Strategy
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
