SGIM Calls for End to Fee-For-Service
Fee-for-service medicine is a financially unsustainable payment model that should be phased out by the end of the decade, a study commissioned by the Society for General Internal Medicine recommends.
The study released Monday by SGIM's National Commission of Physician Payment Reform calls for an aggressive five-year transition into blended payment models such as patient-centered medical homes or accountable care organizations that reward outcomes quality and value. During the transition, the commission said fee-for-service would be "recalibrated" to correct payment inequalities for services such as evaluation and management.
Commission Chairman, Steven A. Schroeder, MD, professor of health and healthcare at the University of California, San Francisco, says he went into the year-long project last March thinking that fix fee-for-service could be fixed, but concluded after months of study that an aggressive phase-out makes more sense.
"It's so complicated to fix it and we've been trying for 30 years," Schroeder tells HealthLeaders Media.
"It promotes higher volume, and because the valuations tend to be huge, to create more high-tech things. It changes the mix of services that a physician provides because there is such a gray area in healthcare. At the margins it creates incentives to do more costly things."
- 'Mega Boards' Could be Rural Healthcare Disruptor
- Ratcheting Up Patient Experience Has a Downside
- Physicians Trained in High-Cost Regions Spend More
- Narrow Networks Enjoying a Resurgence
- Christmas Tree Syndrome Season Underway
- HL20: Anne Wojcicki—Unlocking Consumer Access to Genetics
- Population Health Starts with Ending Hunger
- HL20: Tom X. Lee, MD—Reinventing Primary Care
- HL20: José Ramón Fernández-Peña, MD, MPA—A Welcoming Approach
- HL20: Steve Simonin—Turning It Around