Designation change could cut critical access hospital funds
In rural areas, small town hospitals can be a lifeline. But leaders at rural hospitals across the state are concerned about a report released by the Department of Health and Human Services last fall that suggests the federal government re-evaluate how those hospitals are designated for purposes of Medicare reimbursements. "I don't think there's any question that it would send some of those hospitals over the edge," said Tom Bell, president and CEO of the Topeka-based Kansas Hospital Association. A change in designations could affect how much the 1,300 critical access hospitals nationwide receive in reimbursements – part of the federal government's effort to contain the growth of Medicare.
- Senators Hear How Two-Midnight Rule Harms Patients, Hospitals
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Handshaking Spreads Germs. Get Over It.
- Healthcare Costs Start With What We Eat
- Hospitals Likely to Outsource ICD-10 at Launch
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- CMS Confirms ICD-10 Deadline
- Anatomy of 3 Health System Rebranding Efforts
- Premium Subsidy Fight Creating Uncertainty for Hospitals, Health Plans
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts