Universal coverage too high at any price for some employers
Wall Street Journal (blog), October 22, 2008
One of the biggest question in the national debate over health reform is how, or whether, to get more employers to provide a company health plan, according to this blog posting in the Wall Street Journal. But a new survey from the consulting group Mercer finds that the majority of employers that do not offer health benefits say they would not pay anything or could not pay more than $50 a month to cover an employee. The findings, says Linda Havlin, a Mercer partner, suggest "how tough it's going to be to ask very small employers to voluntarily take on the expense of providing health coverage."
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Medicare Opt-Out a Viable Physician Strategy
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'