Universal coverage too high at any price for some employers
Wall Street Journal (blog), October 22, 2008
One of the biggest question in the national debate over health reform is how, or whether, to get more employers to provide a company health plan, according to this blog posting in the Wall Street Journal. But a new survey from the consulting group Mercer finds that the majority of employers that do not offer health benefits say they would not pay anything or could not pay more than $50 a month to cover an employee. The findings, says Linda Havlin, a Mercer partner, suggest "how tough it's going to be to ask very small employers to voluntarily take on the expense of providing health coverage."
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
