Massachusetts faces costs of big healthcare plan
New York Times, March 16, 2009
Three years ago, Massachusetts brought near-universal health coverage to the state very quickly. To make it happen, Democratic lawmakers and Gov. Mitt Romney deferred until another day any serious effort to control the state's runaway health costs. But threatened first by rapid early enrollment in its new subsidized insurance program and now by a withering economy, the state's health overhaul has entered a second, more challenging phase. Due to new taxes and fees imposed last year, the health plan's jittery finances have stabilized for the moment. But government and industry officials agree that the plan will not be sustainable over the next 5 to 10 years if they do not take significant steps to arrest the growth of health spending.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Less Blood Testing for Some Surgeries Safe, Cost Effective
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer
