2008 a down year for managed care, 2009 looks a little better
A new report released today confirms what a lot of people would have guessed: 2008 was not a good year for managed care companies.
Even though eight of the nine managed care companies reviewed in the KPMG Healthcare and Pharmaceutical Institute's 2009 Managed Care Industry Report saw declines in net income in 2008, the report projects some improvements in 2009, despite a poor economy and uncertainty about the impact of federal healthcare reforms.
John Fitzgibbon, KPMG's managed care sector leader and the author of the report, tells HealthLeaders Media that the managed care industry hasn't seen tough times like this since the mid-1990s. However, he says there is no cause for alarm. "As a group they are still pretty solidly profitable. It's just that the level of profitability is lower than it was in 2007. For the four preceding years, there was not only solid profitability but increasing profitability. That trend changed in 2008," he says.
His report notes that the bleak economy, rising numbers of uninsured, and rising medical costs, are among the factors that are negatively impacting the managed care industry and which are largely beyond its control. "The recession promises to be long and deep, the number of jobs continues to decline, the financial system is in disarray, and consumer confidence is low," Fitzgibbon says in the report. "Most healthcare companies are finding that their businesses are less recession-resistant than previously thought, and the future is uncertain. Managed care companies are faced with declining enrollment as unemployment increases and a tough pricing environment. This will undoubtedly be a challenging year financially for managed care companies."
There is also anxiety in the managed care industry about the impact of yet-to-be-crafted healthcare reforms being considered by Congress. Many insurers anticipating that the final product will provide some gains and some losses. "Provisions to increase federal funding of existing healthcare programs and to decrease the number of uninsured Americans should have a positive impact on managed care companies," Fitzgibbon writes. "Provisions to reduce Medicare Advantage premiums and establish government sponsored health plans probably would not."
The report found that:
- Net income declined for eight of the nine companies analyzed in the report for the year. Income increases for HealthSpring Inc. were mostly attributed to "the loss of low-margin commercial members."
- Membership growth slowed in 2008, and several companies ended the year with fewer members than the previous year. "Organic" membership percentage growth will be "in the low single digits" in 2009.
- Most managed care companies underestimated the rate of increase for medical costs in 2008. That and tanking investments were identified by Fitzgibbon as primary drivers for financial losses. Premiums went up in 2008 but not at a rate high enough to offset increased medical costs.
- Managed care companies expect modest economic improvement in 2009.
- Cost of care is expected to increase in by 7% - 8% in 2009.
- Administrative costs rose for all nine managed care companies, and in some cases those costs rose faster than revenues. Stock performance for managed care companies in 2008 was "very poor," and "fell along with the rest but fell faster and farther," Fitzgibbon writes. "The Morgan Stanley Healthcare Payor Index fell almost 55% during 2008, compared to a 38% decline for the Standard & Poors 500 stock index. On Dec. 31, 2008, the Morgan Stanley Healthcare Payor Index stood approximately 12% above its level five years earlier." He say that many managed care stocks have "bounced back" in the last few months, but are still well below historic highs.
Despite the bleak times, Fitzgibbon says that industry pricing discipline remains strong, and managed care companies report that the market is "competitive but rational. Competitors are unwilling to sacrifice margin for increased membership."
The nine managed-care companies covered in the report are: Aetna Inc.; AMERIGROUP Corp.; Coventry Health Care, Inc.; Health Net, Inc.; HealthSpring, Inc.; Humana Inc.; Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and Hospitals; UnitedHealth Group Inc.; and WellPoint, Inc. The data used in the report was taken from annual reports, and filings to the SEC and other regulatory agencies, and public sources from 2004 to 2008.
John Commins is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare