Indiana Program Shows Health Reform Without Individual Mandate is Costly
Everyone knows about the highs (more insured) and lows (higher costs) in the Massachusetts reform program, but there are other states that have their own reform plans, albeit much smaller. To create a health reform plan that will insure more Americans, improve quality, and lower health costs, Congress and policymakers must learn from successes and failures in state health reform programs.
One program they can learn from is the Healthy Indiana Plan (HIP), which is a Medicaid expansion program that is operating under a federal waiver that allows the state to cover the uninsured who don't qualify for Medicaid. Unlike the Massachusetts plan, which features an individual mandate that requires nearly all residents to have health insurance, Indiana's plan focuses instead on getting coverage to a needy population that isn't eligible for Medicaid.
Massachusetts has experienced growing pains as the individual mandate has brought previously uninsured people, many of whom had put off care, into insurance. But demanding nearly all buy health insurance has also allowed insurers to balance the costs of the more expensive members with healthier individuals who are paying into the system but not using many services.
In Indiana, HIP covered more than 35,000 previously uninsured individuals by the end of its first year. Many of these folks delayed medical care and preventive services before signing up for HIP.
Milliman recently released a review of the program's first year, which shows the dangers of health reform programs. One problem is anti-selection. Anti-selection relates to the highest-risk, most expensive people seeking healthcare care as soon as they get coverage, which brings higher health costs initially. The good news is that after these sicker people get the care they need their health costs decrease over the year—and healthier individuals come aboard within a few months.
Anyone creating a health reform plan must understand that the first year (especially the first few months) will bring in people with the most serious medical problems and who will require the most expensive medical care, says Rob Damler, FSA, MAAA, principal and consulting actuary at Milliman in Indianapolis.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement