California Pushes to Enact Strongest Anti-Rescission Law in the Nation
A bill that may become the strongest legislation in the nation to prevent health plans from dropping coverage to members who become ill passed the California Senate yesterday and may soon be headed for the governor's desk.
The bill, called AB 2, is expected to receive Assembly approval in the next few days.
If it is signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, as its sponsors anticipate, the legislation would set up an independent board, managed by two state agencies, which would have to approve any health plan's cancellation of an enrollee's plan. Only when insurers prove the applicant intentionally misrepresented his or her health on the questionnaire would cancellation be approved.
If an insurer tried to cancel a policy without getting approval, the state Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance would impose administrative penalties.
"This legislation will ensure that health plans and insurers do not act as ‘judge and jury' whenever they want to rescind or cancel a policy," the bill's author, Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, said in a statement yesterday.
The California Association of Health Plans, which represents 39 health insurance companies, is strongly opposed to the bill not because of the requirement for panel review, but because of the difficulty in proving someone intentionally withheld health information in an attempt to deceive.
"It's hard to prove, because it's virtually impossible to prove what was in a person's mind or heart," Nicole Kasabian Evans, spokesperson for CAHP. "Setting the standard to be based on what information was known or available at the time a person applied for coverage is a more reasonable standard."
Charles Bacchi, the association's executive vice president of CAHP, says, "Unfortunately, there are some cases where enrollees are not accurately disclosing their health status and it drives up the cost of insurance for everybody else. It is important to note that health plans rarely rescind policies.
"Only one tenth of 1 percent—a tiny fraction—of individual policies are rescinded. However, with just 5 % of beneficiaries accounting for more than half of healthcare costs, it only takes a few people misrepresenting their health status to make everyone else have to pay more."
The bill would also standardize the set of health history questions all insurance plans doing business in California are allowed to ask and would require plans and insurers to complete medical underwriting prior to issuing a contract. That's because in many cases, applicants may not know or remember what is in their medical record with enough detail to be honest about it on the application.
Such cancellation practices have become increasingly common, with health insurers dumping their members on grounds that they were not forthcoming in their applications about previous health issues, regardless of whether they remembered them and regardless of whether they have any bearing on their current illnesses.
Unlike similar language in some of the national health reform bills that call for a guaranteed issue, which would not take effect until 2013, the California legislation would take effect in January 2011.
De La Torre of South Gate, who sponsored the bill with the California Medical Association, says studies of such rescission practices estimate that 1,000 people in the state now have their insurance policies cancelled by their health plans because of such practices. Under this new law, they would have no interruption in their care.
"For example, there was a gentleman in his 50s who forgot to mention on his application for health insurance that he had knee surgery when he was 18," De La Torre says. "They held him accountable and cancelled him after he got cancer, even though there was no connection between the surgery and the cancer."
"They were happy to take peoples' insurance premiums as long as they are healthy, but not after they got sick," De La Torre says.
He adds that Texas and Connecticut have new rules barring rescissions, but without the teeth of the independent agency that would be required to approve any insurance plan's petition to cancel a person's coverage.
"Insurance companies in California have a long track record of rescinding health coverage after people get sick," says Dev GnanaDev, MD, president of the CMA, which helped sponsor the AB 2. "The practice of rescission puts patients at risk, leading to increasing medical costs for the patient, doctor, and hospital, while the insurer makes a profit.
"Unfortunately, fines and lawsuits have not deterred such practices, and settlements amount to a slap on the wrist after the damage is already done. Assembly Bill 2 would protect patients when they need it most, making certain that health plans and insurers do not act as 'judge and jury,' whenever they want to rescind or cancel a policy."
- Hospital Groups Strike Back at Hospital Rating Systems
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- AHIP: Enormity of HIX Challenges Sinks In
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- How Succession Planning Boosts Employee Retention Rates
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure