Is HHS Compromising with Insurers?
Pardon the football analogy, but it's fall:
It's fourth and ten and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is just out of field goal range. They've been driving hard to an end zone with the words "Affordable Care Act" painted in big letters, but with a comfortable lead and plenty of time on the clock, the smart thing to do is, of course, to punt.
That's exactly what HHS did with the ACA's current 800-pound gorilla: ensuring children with preexisting conditions can get healthcare coverage.
In an October 13 letter from Secretary Sebelius to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), HHS attempted to stem the recent trend among healthcare payers to drop "child only" health plans by clarifying policies that aren't explicitly forbidden by the Act.
Among those clarifications, HHS says insurers are within their rights to (if permitted by state laws):
- Maintain separate "child-only" policies separate from closed policies;
- Penalize members that drop coverage and subsequently reapply;
- Set the number and length of open enrollment periods; and
- Adjust rates based on members' health status.
- 3 Favorite Nursing Trends of 2013
- Hospital Compare Adds Infection, Stroke, Readmissions Data
- ICD-10: Minimizing the Financial Hit
- HIT in 2014: Portal Perils and Half-Built Houses
- Intelligence Report: Cost-Containment Expertise
- How One Provider is Saving Millions on Imaging Equipment
- SGR Bill's Payment Transparency Provision Elicits Concern
- SGR Repeal Bill Holds Extra Promise for Rural Hospitals
- HL20: Martin Makary, MD—Pushing to Improve Transparency and Quality Standards
- HL20: David Green—Disruptive Innovator Touches Millions of Lives