HHS Proposes Rules to Clarify Health Insurance Coverage
The federal government on Wednesday unveiled proposed rules to help consumers better understand their health insurance benefits and costs, and search for the most appropriate coverage.
"We are telling insurance companies that they need to be more transparent about the benefits they offer, what they are spending premium dollars on, and justifications for any proposed rate increases," Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Donald Berwick, MD, said in a Wednesday afternoon media teleconference. "This is all grounded in the idea that the more informed the patient is, the better decisions he or she can make."
Berwick acknowledged that insurance benefits and cost information confuses many consumers. "Many times people will make decisions on coverage and not understand what it means for them until they get sick or until their care is denied or until they face high out-of-pocket costs," he said.
The Summary of Benefits and Coverage proposed rules would give consumers access to two forms to help them evaluate their health insurance choices, including: a summary of benefits and coverage; and a uniform glossary explaining terms such as "deductible" and "co-pay."
If the proposed rules are adopted, health plans would be required to provide the forms to shoppers and enrollees upon request and before coverage is purchased. The forms are scheduled to be available sometime in 2012 for the more than 180 million health insurance consumers with private health insurance coverage.
America's Health Insurance Plans raised concerns that the proposed rule would create an expensive burden that insurers would pass along to their customers. "The benefits of providing a new summary of coverage document must be balanced against the increased administrative burden and higher costs to consumers and employers," AHIP press secretary Robert Zirkelbach said in a media release.
"For example, since most large employers customize the benefit packages they provide to their employees, some health plans could be required to create tens of thousands of different versions of this new document—which would add administrative costs without meaningfully helping employees."
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big