States Stymied in $4.3B Medicaid Collection Efforts
It's back to square one for states' efforts to recoup an estimated $4.3 billion they erroneously paid for Medicaid services for almost 280,000 beneficiaries who should instead have been enrolled in the Medicare program.
At issue is a Social Security Administration error that classified some disabled enrollees as eligible for Supplemental Security Income when actually they were eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance. That means states used their own Medicaid funds to cover the care that Medicare should have provided. The mistake was first discovered in 1999 and dates back to cases in the 1970s. The SSA created the special disability workload project to work through the errors.
In June 2011, the National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) sent a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services asking Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to use the department's Medicare and Medicaid demonstration program authority to resolve the longstanding issue.
Sebelius responded in an October 27th letter that she lacked "the statutory authority to use my demonstration authorities to this end." She added that she would "work with affected states to explore possible legislative solutions."
The funds are particularly important as states face mounting Medicaid expenses. States' spending for the Medicaid program is expected to increase by a record 29% in fiscal year 2012, according to a survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation's Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. The individual state shares of the misallocated funds are estimated to range from $3.5 million for Wyoming to $821.2 million for California, according to data from the University of Massachusetts Medical Schools Center for Health Care Financing.
- How the Military's EHR Reboot Will Impact Interoperability
- HCA to Acquire CareNow Urgent Care Centers
- Federal Appeals Court Mulls Observation Status
- BCBS Tries New Drug Contracting Model
- Abington Health, Jefferson Health Plan '100% Equal' Merger
- Dental Board Case Before SCOTUS Has Far-Reaching Implications
- How One Health System Saved $3.5M in Benefits Costs
- The Case for Recycling Surgical Supplies
- Ballot Initiative Pits Providers Against Payers in SD
- 76% of Physicians Don't Like CMS Quality Reporting Programs