Implications are far-reaching in states' challenge of federal healthcare law
The New York Times, March 26, 2012
The implications for the healthcare overhaul are also enormous. The Congressional Budget Office says that about half of the people expected to gain coverage under the new law—16 million of the 31 million people—will get it through Medicaid. States say the federal law is unconstitutionally coercive because all their Medicaid money would be at risk if they flout the new requirement. The states' argument has implications that go far beyond healthcare. It raises questions about Congress's ability to attach conditions to federal grants to the states for other purposes.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
- CMS Releases Hospital Pricing Data
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Hospital Pricing Data Dump Won't Hurt You, Yet
- Telemedicine is Retail Health Clinics' Newest Tool
