Health Plans Don't Always Play Hardball with Providers
When you're looking for healthcare cost drivers, don't overlook those high-prestige, must-have hospitals that payers need in their networks to keep their customers satisfied. Their rates are hobbling health insurers, or so it appears.
But get this: Sometimes health plans don't play hardball when it comes to provider negotiations. They'll agree to large increases in provider payments as long as their competitors pay even higher rates.
Must-haves, by the way, are often academic medical centers like Partners Healthcare in Boston. While they used to be referral centers for more specialized care, these must-haves are offering more primary and secondary care, as well as tertiary and quaternary care.
Robert A. Berenson has looked into this phenomena and produced a study that appears in the May issue of Health Affairs. Berenson is a fellow at the Urban Institute and serves as vice chair of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission or MedPac. Along with Paul Ginsberg, president of the Center for Studying Health System Change, Berenson and his team conducted interviews with healthcare leaders in the 12 metropolitan communities involved the center's community tracking study.
Geography, specialized services and the size of the hospital system across multiple markets can also play a role being deemed a must-have. Berenson says that's the case in Miami where Baptist Health, which is not an academic medical center, effectively competes with the University of Miami Hospital and is considered a must-have for insurers.
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- Advocate, NorthShore Deal Would Create 16-Hospital System
- 3 Strategies for Retaining Millennial Employees
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances
- 'Early Offer' Malpractice Programs May Spur Reform
- How to Build a Health Plan from Scratch
- Limiting choice to control health spending: A caution