Judge: Health-care law is constitutional
The Washington Post, October 8, 2010
A federal judge in Michigan ruled Thursday that the new health-care overhaul law is constitutional, rejecting an argument that Congress lacked the power to create the legislation's "individual mandate," which requires virtually all Americans to purchase health insurance. Other federal courts have already dismissed some challenges to the law on technical grounds - ruling, for instance, that the plaintiffs lacked standing. However, the decision issued Thursday by Judge George Caram Steeh of the Eastern District of Michigan is the first to reject a claim based on the merits, marking a notable victory for the Obama administration.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Urologists 'Outraged' Over PSA Test Challenge
- New Facebook Page Gathers Stories of Medical Harm
- Luxury Hospital Facilities Put Patient Experience First
- Five Hospitals Share Three Secrets to Improve Knee Surgery Outcomes
- Health Insurance Exchanges Put Defined Benefits to the Test
- Heartland Health Joins Mayo Clinic Network
- How Rivals Built an ACO
- Beleaguered Fairview Health CEO to Retire in July
- TN Health System Charts Its Own Course
- E-book Revolution Changes, Challenges Healthcare

