NLRB Rules Changes Could Tilt Balance of Power
"It is probably the most liberal, pro-labor board in the 30 plus years I've been doing this," says James G. Trivisonno, president of Detroit-based IRI Consultants, who predicts that the board will adopt most – if not all – of the proposed changes. Those changes, he says, provide organized labor with side-door access to many of the provisions unsuccessfully sought when the Employee Free Choice Act fizzled in Congress last year.
One proposed change, Trivisonno says, would require employers to provide to union organizers before an organizing vote a list of employees, their worksite locations, the shifts they work, and their job classifications.
Another proposed change would facilitate organizing smaller "specialty" bargaining units. "For example, a group of lab techs may want to organize versus an entire group of technical employees at an acute-care facility," Trivisonno says.
The biggest proposed rule change, Trivisonno says, would reduce to a matter of days the amount of time between an announced organizing campaign and a representative election. In effect, he says, union organizers could spend months quietly laying the groundwork for a representative election, before "springing" an election notice on unwitting employers.
- Healthcare Leaders Seek Strategic Sweet Spot
- 3 Reasons Wellness Programs Fail
- CMS Issues Health Insurance Exchange Proposed Rules
- Patients Shoulder Nearly 25% of Medical Bills
- ACOs Widespread, Yet Challenged
- Healthcare Costs 'An Abomination' Says Senate Finance Committee Chair
- MGMA: Physician Compensation Increasingly Based on Quality Measures
- Healthcare Consolidation: M&A Not the Only Way
- 6 CNO-to-CEO Strategies
- PwC: Pace of Rising Medical Costs Slowing