Ruling calls review of Seattle Children's Hospital expansion impacts inadequate
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, April 22, 2009
Seattle planners did not adequately review potential impacts of Seattle Children's Hospital's proposed expansion plan, a hearing examiner ruled. Ruling on the Laurelhurst Community Club's appeal of the city's environmental impact statement, the examiner said planners did not go into enough detail about how the proposal conflicted with city land-use policies or about 136 homes that would be demolished as part of the expansion. Planners must lay out how the proposal conflicts with certain city land-use policies and meets other stated city objectives, giving City Council members information they need to make a balanced decision, the examiner wrote.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Healthcare Leaders Seek Strategic Sweet Spot
- 3 Reasons Wellness Programs Fail
- CMS Issues Health Insurance Exchange Proposed Rules
- Patients Shoulder Nearly 25% of Medical Bills
- ACOs Widespread, Yet Challenged
- MGMA: Physician Compensation Increasingly Based on Quality Measures
- HFMA: Patient Financial Interaction Guidelines Sharpened
- 6 CNO-to-CEO Strategies
- HFMA: Revenue Cycle, Reimbursements Share the Spotlight
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
