Are We Missing Gawande's Point?
If you've not heard the buzz surrounding Atul Gawande's recent New Yorker article, "The Cost Conundrum," you've either been out of the country or you've been following the Michael Jackson death soap opera too closely.
Let's just say that the good doctor's efforts have struck a chord. Even the president has mentioned the article in his efforts to get Congress to pass a healthcare reform bill.
Gawande's work to present the healthcare cost disparity in narrative form has caught the attention of many who believe healthcare's costs are out of control and that its growth profile is completely unsustainable. He found that tiny McAllen, TX, boasts higher healthcare costs than any other statistical area in the country, save Miami, which has much higher staffing and living costs. And the outcomes aren't any better.
Not one, not two, but three influential people gave speeches last week at the American Hospital Association's annual Leadership Summit in which they prominently referenced the article as a window into the problem with healthcare costs. I've been to other conferences around the country too this summer, and if the article is not the first topic people bring up in casual conversation about healthcare, it's the second.
But so what?
What amazes me about these speeches and conversations is not the fact that the article has received so much acclaim. It is well-written, and Gawande, a physician himself, does an admirable job of searching for other possible explanations to McAllen's cost problem than the conclusion to which he's ultimately drawn:
Are people there are unhealthier than those in other areas of the country? No.
Do hospitals and physicians in McAllen provide exceptionally better healthcare than anywhere else? No.
Is it malpractice insurance costs? No.
Is there overutilization of medical services? Absolutely.
People are waving this article around like it's some revelation. They're rightly using it as a call to action for healthcare providers, government, and payers to coordinate care and use evidence-based protocols to prevent so many unnecessary tests and surgeries. But where have they been for 20 years?
The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care has been around for more than that long. It says the essentially same thing as Gawande's article, except it's much more detailed, depending on reams of Medicare cost data to tell essentially the same truth.
- Sebelius Lashes Out at Anthem for Premium Increases
- 10 Ways to Improve Handoffs in Your Hospital
- Nurse Anesthetists Say They Practice Safely Without Physician Supervision
- There are Big Bucks in Better Patient Flow
- Doctors Sue To Stop Unsupervised Nurse Anesthetists from Administering Anesthesia
- CT Hospital was Prepared for Power Plant Explosion
- Can Nurses Drive Health Reform?
- Expectant Moms, The White House is Calling
- Texas nurse to stand trial for reporting doctor
- HIPAA Harm Threshold Works, Say Providers

SeemsLike (8/5/2009 at 1:01 PM)
Seems like we have non-physicians banging the drum of 'I want cheaper or free healthcare, and I want it now.' Well, I've got some news for you. Remember Gubment cheese? How about your friendly post office or DMV workers? Is that the kind of healthcare you want? Or do you want prompt access to the very best in healthcare? THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH. REPEAT AFTER ME. THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH. And we aren't even going to address the whole hi risk, smoking, obesity issues now are we? Cancer is cancer, and we offer the greatest fastest most advanced care in the world BAR NONE. You want the care, you pay for it. One way or another. You want free? Go to England or Candada... but you'll be back soon enough when you find out the waiting list is 12 months.. then lets see how eager you are to ration care when its YOUR family member and you DEMAND the latest and greatest RIGHT NOW because you can pay for it. Don't worry though, when you get stuck in line, those of you who have money will bypass... just like the folks do right now in our socialized medicine countries. Nothing new here folks.. Move along...
VA (8/5/2009 at 3:54 AM)
If you live in the area you know that something is wrong. Each hospital wants to do everything instead of coordinating among them and share services. Every hospital wants to be THE hospital of the Valley. How can you audit doctors if everything is based on doctors notes, it is easy to lie in a note and build up a case towards more reimbursement. How can you report negligence or fraud to the Texas Medical Board if big investors from the Doctors owned hospital are members of the Texas Board? How can you report them to the authorities if the big bankers-big investors have important relationships with political authorities in the area? How can you make fraud public if the same hospital has a lot of economical and political power and can manipulate the news in the area? They say it is all easy to explain...they should get an insider from their business meetings and see all the corruption that goes in there. How can a doctor report another doctor, if you do it your career is over in this area. If you all know what mafia means, this is something like that. It is hard to get in, it is harder to get out.
drcrcarlson (8/3/2009 at 2:37 PM)
Wow...once again we seem in search of an 8th grade solution to a graduate school problem. Please see the very insightful article and resulting comment flow in the WSJ (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124898627892394853.html) This outlines the very real issues faced by physicians in trying to navigate holistic and appropriate care for a PATIENT through a very bad segmented system based on reimbursement rather than care.