Hospital loses court battle to keep medical records secret
Shands Teaching Hospital must release peer review and internal risk documents to a couple who is suing the hospital for medical malpractice, a Tallahassee appeals court ruled on Tuesday.
First District Court of Appeal Judge Charles Kahn in a 15-page ruling opined that a lower court erred when it denied a motion compelling the hospital to produce the records. Kahn said the records must be turned over because of Amendment 7, a measure that was passed six years ago.
Shands argued that its own internal investigation showed that there was no medical negligence and, therefore, the documents don't need to be produced because Amendment 7 applies to adverse medical incidents.
- Antibiotic Overuse a 'Huge Threat' to Patient Safety, Says CDC
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- CHS Hacked, 4.5M Patient Records Compromised
- Business Roundup: M&A Activity Down Slightly in First Half of 2014
- CFO Exchange: Healthcare Leaders Share 5 Innovative Ideas
- Large Employers Trimming Healthcare Spending
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'