Hospital loses court battle to keep medical records secret
Shands Teaching Hospital must release peer review and internal risk documents to a couple who is suing the hospital for medical malpractice, a Tallahassee appeals court ruled on Tuesday.
First District Court of Appeal Judge Charles Kahn in a 15-page ruling opined that a lower court erred when it denied a motion compelling the hospital to produce the records. Kahn said the records must be turned over because of Amendment 7, a measure that was passed six years ago.
Shands argued that its own internal investigation showed that there was no medical negligence and, therefore, the documents don't need to be produced because Amendment 7 applies to adverse medical incidents.
- Senators Hear How Two-Midnight Rule Harms Patients, Hospitals
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Healthcare Costs Start With What We Eat
- Handshaking Spreads Germs. Get Over It.
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- Hospitals Likely to Outsource ICD-10 at Launch
- Anatomy of 3 Health System Rebranding Efforts