Leadership
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Medical Errors Stubbornly Common, Studies Find

John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media, December 2, 2010

It's been 11 years since the Institute of Medicine reported in December 1999 that medical errors caused more than 98,000 deaths and injured more than 1 million people each year. Unfortunately, the results from two recent studies indicate that—despite a lot of focus and effort—the nation's hospitals have not significantly reduced medical errors, which still lead to tens of thousands of deaths each year.

Hospital advocates don't dispute the findings, but they also don't believe the last 10 years were a lost decade. They believe that progress has been made, even if it is not immediately apparent.

"It was discouraging not to see more evidence that the hard work that has gone on in the past decade has had as substantial an impact as we believe it has. But the studies are what the studies are," says Nancy Foster, vice president for quality at the American Hospital Association.

"There are enormous numbers of hospitals engaged in a number of activities directly addressing patient safety issues. Are we there yet? No. It is a multifaceted problem that requires a multifaceted approach," she says. "We have to keep hammering at it until we get to the level of safety that we expect of ourselves and the public rightfully expects of us. As these studies suggest, we have a ways to go."

The studies—one from Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, the other from the New England Journal of Medicine—indicate that medical errors remain widespread, common, and deadly. The OIG study found that one in seven Medicare beneficiaries suffers an adverse event during a hospital stay, and those events, nearly half of them preventable, contributed to at least 15,000 deaths in a single month.

The second study, published in the Nov. 25 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, examined 2,300 randomly selected patients' records at 10 hospitals in North Carolina from 2002-2007 and found 588 instances of "patient harm," including surgical errors, hospital falls, misdiagnoses, medication errors, and hospital-acquired infections. Fifty of the incidents were considered life threatening, and 14 people died, according to the study.

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

3 comments on "Medical Errors Stubbornly Common, Studies Find"


Dev Raheja (12/9/2010 at 8:04 PM)
I agrre that medical errors are stubbornly common. The bad news is that they are going to remain common for a long time. First, there is a lack of competion because competitors copy each othere in the name of practicing evidence based medicine. There are many other excuses. I have covered them in my new book "Safer Hospital Care."

Shea Steinberg (12/6/2010 at 1:46 PM)
With the ARRA HITECH Stimulus, I believe a portion of these common medical errors will soon dissipate as more medical providers are encouraged to use <a href="http://www.practicefusion.com?utm_source=comment&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=PFLS">electronic health records</a> . Paper records are one of the reasons why so many patients are misdiagnosed and why there are so many medical errors. We can easily erase those errors by going digital. -Shea Steinberg Jr. Social Media Specialist

kit (12/6/2010 at 12:25 PM)
Please provide input If my data is incorrect. *The aggregate work showed that the majority of errors were not life threatening. * Inconsistent staffing patterns which may contribute to morbidity & mortality. For instance GME laws have increased the number of junior MD handing information off. Furthermore, even the Magnet hospitals haven't kept pace with NNU nursing ratios. Moreover, there is no clear work advantages found in these facilities. Finally, we have no survey data to show us that senior nursing staff will stay in high acuity units. In fact, there is some anecdotal data showing the converse. * Finally, many hospitals contain patients for end of life (EOL) care. Including these EOL patients in your data will increase the adverse events significantly.