Opinion: UPMC board members go dark

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 11, 2011
In July of this year, UPMC got rid of more than half of its board of directors. The explanation was plausible enough: The board had grown unwieldy over time as UPMC took over new hospitals. A consultant advised that a smaller group would be more practical. Twenty-nine board members were invited out. Shortly before this happened, UPMC announced a unilateral divorce from the region's largest insurer, insisting that Highmark's rescue of a much smaller hospital system made it a direct competitor. Without a new contract, many Highmarkers will find UPMC services too expensive. They will have to pay substantially higher out-of-network rates, change insurance companies (as if that were as easy as changing their minds) or seek care elsewhere, and to hell with doctor-patient relationships. Is it a coincidence that the board was so dramatically downsized just as UPMC went to the mattresses? It's not unusual to reduce a board, but then again, if you're going to war, you only want your most trusted lieutenants in the tent.

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.


MOST POPULAR

SPONSORED REPORTS
SPONSORED HEADLINES

SIGN UP

FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine

SPONSORSHIP & ADVERTISING

100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027

800-727-5257

About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2014 a division of BLR All rights reserved.