A look back at Court's arguments on healthcare, laughs included
The New York Times, June 28, 2012
The Supreme Court's momentous decision on the fate of President Obama's health care law is likely to be dry, sober, weighty and self-conscious about its place in constitutional history. The arguments in the case, held exactly three months ago, were something else entirely. They illuminated the work of a court that takes a distinctively loose and even lighthearted approach to adjudication. A timely new study, based on an impressively detailed review of the transcripts and audio recordings, revealed an exceptionally garrulous and jocular bench.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Hospital Pricing Irks Nurses; More Jobs, Less Pay
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
