MA health cost bill may not attack key problem
Now, the impact of two major proposals in the House plan that are intended to level the playing field —a one-time luxury tax on high-priced providers and restrictions on contract negotiations—is in doubt after lobbying by hospitals. The Senate proposal, meanwhile, takes a more indirect approach to the problem, including establishing another commission to dig deeper for the reasons for price differences and requirements to publicly track price inequities. But Governor Deval Patrick and Senate President Therese Murray have made clear that they oppose the House plan to tax providers whose prices are at least 120 percent of the statewide median and redistribute the money to struggling hospitals, making approval in its current form unlikely.
- How Medical Debt Forgiveness Benefits Hospitals
- Leapfrog Hospital Safety Scores 'Depressing'
- Patient Harm Data to Remain on Medicare's Hospital Compare Site
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
- Tavenner Confirmed as CMS Administrator
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Healthcare Leaders Sound Off on Organized Labor
- Esther Dyson's Population Health Dream
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Rural Healthcare Can Entice the Best and Brightest