Hospital Mergers Unlikely to be Affected by Antitrust Ruling
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruling this week that makes it harder for local hospital authorities to claim immunity from federal antitrust laws will likely have little practical effect on most hospitals mergers taking place across the nation, observers say.
In a running two-year old legal battle, the Federal Trade Commission challenged as anticompetitive Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.'s proposed $195 million acquisition of rival Palmyra Park Hospital, in Albany, GA from HCA.
The FTC alleged that Phoebe Putney constructed an elaborate scheme that used the Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County, GA as a "straw man" to "cloak private, anticompetitive activity in governmental guise in the hopes that it would exempt the acquisition from federal antitrust law."
In June, 2011 a federal district judge ruled that the PPHS was immune from federal antitrust liability under the FTC Act and the Clayton Act. The FTC appealed the ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals but lost again.
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- Hospital Groups Strike Back at Hospital Rating Systems
- AHIP: Enormity of HIX Challenges Sinks In
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers