Teamwork and Retooling Care
Qualify for a free subscription to HealthLeaders magazine.
This article appears in the July/August issue of HealthLeaders magazine.
In our April Intelligence Report, the top challenge cited by leaders in pursuing a collaborative care model is "concerns about the ultimate cost savings." Members cited coding discrepancies, budget cuts, and convincing physicians to share the risks as barriers to incorporating a collaborative care model.
What do you see as the path to ensure cost savings in a collaborative care model, and what can leaders do to facilitate that?
Robert Ross, MD
Medical Director of Community Health Strategy
St. Charles Health System, St. Charles Medical Group
On behavioral health: We have four clinics that are Tier 3 medical homes and in three of them we have fulltime behavioral health folks. For example, if a physician or actually any member of the team identifies a patient as being depressed they can get help not just in terms of medication but also using both psychotherapy or some type behavioral therapy and medications, which results in better outcomes for patients.
Robert Ross MD
On coordinating payments: One of the problems we encounter is that you have to divide up the billing and costs for the separate services. Ultimately to have the many services, not just behavioral health but other things like pharmacy services, you could name a billion things, especially with people who have difficulty with access, so combining those and paying for them with some sort of global fee, probably capitation, would make it easier for everyone concerned and not just physicians. It eliminates costs for insurers as well in terms of verifying that services were delivered. Ultimately that is where we are heading, but that is a guess.
On coding shortcomings: There is a huge unexplored area of what is not coded and what things that patients have or experience that potentially are in the notes but not discerned by payers. The data we mine is determined by the provider codes and that is not a particularly accurate way of getting at people's problems because you code for what you are paid for and not necessarily for all the problems that are contained in a patient visit. It's a very complex problem.
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Providers Prep for New Payment Models as Population Health Grows
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- 3 Ways to Rev Employee Development Programs
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- Aligning Executive Compensation with Provider Mission