The State of Healthcare Marketing ROI
When healthcare marketers talk about measuring the success of their campaigns, they tend to lump all measurement under the heading ROI. I do it, too, by the way. We count the number of hits on a Web site, the number of physicians who stop us in the hall to say they liked your most recent campaign, the number of people who attended the opening of a new hospital. And that's fine, but it's not ROI.
"'Hard' ROI simply means that results are measured by the actual collected revenues after taking into account the actual cost of the effort," writes healthcare marketing consultant David Marlowe in the introduction to his book, A Marketer's Guide to Measuring ROI, published by HealthLeaders Media. "ROI means there is a financial return. If no revenue was generated as a result of the marketing effort, there is no ROI."
It's true that there are many challenges to measuring hard ROI in the healthcare setting and that, for many campaigns, the only way to show that your marketing had impact are the softer measurements, such as an increase in patient satisfaction scores. But, Marlowe says, "That doesn't relieve provider-based marketers from the responsibility of establishing other quantifiable methods."
Healthcare marketers seem to be getting better at setting objectives and demonstrating results, Bob Konold, senior vice president and group creative director at SPM Marketing & Communications in La Grange, IL, told me for an article in this month's HealthLeaders magazine.
But in healthcare, at least, "better" doesn't always mean "great." Susan Dubuque, president and cofounder of Neathawk Dubuque & Packett in Richmond, VA, agrees with Konold that healthcare marketing professionals are getting better at documenting outcomes of their efforts, with a caveat: "True measures of ROI in the accounting sense of the word are, however, still not common in healthcare."
Patrick Buckley, president and CEO of PB Healthcare Business Solutions LLC in Milwaukee and author of the HealthLeaders Media book, The Complete Guide to Healthcare Marketing, puts it even more plainly: Counting Web hits and impressions isn't evidence of a successful campaign, he says.
Indeed, in the 2009 HealthLeaders Media Industry Survey, only 7% of marketing leaders said they place an emphasis on financial ROI only. The vast majority of marketers—just more than 85%—say they use a mix of soft and hard measurement.
That number isn't likely to shift dramatically anytime soon. So while financial ROI is still the gold standard, the fact that healthcare marketers seem to be getting better at showing the impact of their efforts in a variety of ways is still good news.
Just don't call it ROI.
For more insight into the current state of healthcare marketing—including how hospitals have changed their tactics during the recession and emerging trends in healthcare marketing—check out Taking the Measure of Healthcare Marketing.
You can download a PDF of the first chapter of Marlowe's book, which offers examples of what constitutes financial ROI as well as a tutorial on how to calculate financial ROI. The first chapter of Buckley's book is also available for free download—it includes a section that details some of the challenges that healthcare marketers face, including a discussion about the fact that the value of healthcare marketing is often intangible.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media Marketing Weekly, a free weekly e-newsletter that provides news and information tailored to the specific needs of community hospitals.
Gienna Shaw is a senior technology editor with HealthLeaders magazine. She can be reached at gshaw@healthleadersmedia.com.
Follow Gienna Shaw on Twitter
- 10 Major Changes to Health Reform in House's Reconciliation Bill
- Cardiology Group Fights Medicare Pay Cuts by Offering Concierge Services
- Primary Care is Unappealing to Many Medical Students
- Where Have All the CEOs Gone?
- Match Day a Reminder of Primary Care's Struggles
- Can 'Deadly Deliveries' Be a Wake-Up Call to Physicians, Hospitals?
- CBO: Latest Health Reform Bill Would Cost $940 Billion
- CEOs: Employee Retention Is Your Job
- Ten Ways to Increase Nurses' Time at the Bedside
- Benchmarking for Beleaguered Budgets

Christine Ricci (1/28/2010 at 9:48 AM)
To help prove in marketing value and justify budgetary spend, it is important to leverage multiple metrics to demonstrate marketing success. Trending is key, too. Always showing what the baseline was and how the marketing continues to improve upon that baseline, makes it tough to argue value. Finally, value should be shown through macro view (i.e. cost per lead for a month - all lead generating marketing tactics rolled into the cost figure) and micro view (i. e. cost per lead by each lead generating marketing tactic). This not only demonstrates sound financial responsibility, but it also gives you the opportunty to continually optimize at a strategic level as well as a very tactical level.
Chris Bevolo (1/27/2010 at 2:17 PM)
Hooray for this post! It may seem like semantics, but lumping everything under "ROI" can really get marketers in trouble. There are many ways to measure success (I disagree with the statement that web hits don't equal success - they do, just one form of success, and not the ultimate form). But using "ROI" when you don't really mean "ROI" may set expectations with others in the organization - especially those in finance and the C-suite - that you're talking about actual financial returns. If you're not, prepare for the "high hat" (sorry, one of my fav terms from "Miller's Crossing").