CMS Plan Would Tie Efficiency Scores to Hospital Payments
Medicare officials have quietly posted on the Hospital Compare website a "cost per Medicare beneficiary" score for acute care hospitals. The data shows a 3.1-fold difference in costs across the country.
Anyone may download Hospital Compare data to see comparative risk-adjusted scores for every hospital. Users may compare the most and least expensive among 3,375 hospitals provided for an "episode" of care, described as a point three days prior to admission to 30 days after discharge for care delivered by any provider paid under Medicare Part A or Part B.
This score "is important, because it complements the quality and outcome measures to be used in assessing hospitals’ performance," Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services spokesman Don McLeod, said in an e-mail.
Hospital leaders worried
But this new and very public way to evaluate acute care has many hospital leaders worried. Some say the scores, which are based on providers' Medicare claims, aren't fair or accurate.
Moreover, under authority from the Affordable Care Act, Medicare's latest Inpatient Prospective Payment System rule proposes to use "cost per Medicare beneficiary" as a significant chunk—20%—of a hospital's value-based purchasing score to determine incentive payments for discharges starting Oct. 1, 2014.
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- In PCMH, the 'P' is Not for 'Physician'
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- Six Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives