Infection Expert: Don't Rush to Change MRSA Protocols
Hospitals should continue to conduct routine risk assessments to determine how well their infection control strategies are working before rushing to adopt a highly touted and possibly costly new protocol, says a member of the board of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology.
The report that an antibiotic ointment and special soap kill more MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) bacteria in intensive care units than screening and isolating patients found positive may come as a shock to hospital infection control chiefs, says a representative of a national association of infection preventionists.
"This was a great study, very large and robust, with lots of hospitals," says Marc-Oliver Wright, MT, corporate director of infection control for the four-hospital NorthShore University HealthSystem in Evanston, IL, and a member of the board of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. "I'm sure this is landing like a small bomb in my state as well.
I'd be surprised if there's any responsible organization in this country that isn't looking at this article and asking themselves the question, 'should we change our practice,'" he says.
"But to be honest, the last thing I would want is for people to rush out and modify their practices, or create new legislative mandates based on one paper," Wright says.
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- 4 Crucial Tactics for Reining in Healthcare Cost
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- How, and Why, to Recruit Male Nurses
- Docs Fret as HHS Addresses Malpractice Reporting 'Loopholes'
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013