Infection Expert: Don't Rush to Change MRSA Protocols
Hospitals should continue to conduct routine risk assessments to determine how well their infection control strategies are working before rushing to adopt a highly touted and possibly costly new protocol, says a member of the board of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology.
The report that an antibiotic ointment and special soap kill more MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) bacteria in intensive care units than screening and isolating patients found positive may come as a shock to hospital infection control chiefs, says a representative of a national association of infection preventionists.
"This was a great study, very large and robust, with lots of hospitals," says Marc-Oliver Wright, MT, corporate director of infection control for the four-hospital NorthShore University HealthSystem in Evanston, IL, and a member of the board of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. "I'm sure this is landing like a small bomb in my state as well.
I'd be surprised if there's any responsible organization in this country that isn't looking at this article and asking themselves the question, 'should we change our practice,'" he says.
"But to be honest, the last thing I would want is for people to rush out and modify their practices, or create new legislative mandates based on one paper," Wright says.
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- Providers Prep for New Payment Models as Population Health Grows
- 3 Ways to Rev Employee Development Programs
- Transforming Decision Support and Reporting
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Nurse Ethics Comes to a Head at Guantanamo Bay
- Aligning Executive Compensation with Provider Mission
- In Lakeport, CA, a Population Health Laboratory is Born
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health