Merck faces another round of criticism
Philadelphia Inquirer, August 19, 2008
For the third time in three years, a prominent medical journal has criticized Merck & Co. Inc. for misrepresenting research on its pain reliever Vioxx. The editors of the Annals of Internal Medicine said the journal's findings may point to a broader problem in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug companies have long been suspected of enlisting doctors in trials solely to get doctors in the "habit of prescribing a new drug," the editors said. These are known as "seeding" trials, and the editorial says such trials pay doctors involved in them to consult with the drug company plus a fee for each patient they enroll.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- 10 Major Changes to Health Reform in House's Reconciliation Bill
- Match Day a Reminder of Primary Care's Struggles
- Can 'Deadly Deliveries' Be a Wake-Up Call to Physicians, Hospitals?
- Physicians Generate $1.5M Annually for Their Hospitals, Says Survey
- Cardiology Group Fights Medicare Pay Cuts by Offering Concierge Services
- 3 Lessons U.S. Healthcare Can Learn from France to Cut Infections
- Hospital Monitors Infectious Diseases Using Real-Time Surveillance
- Six Reasons Proposed Hospital Advertising Ban Will Never Pass
- Hospitals Make Employee Flu Vaccinations a Patient Safety Issue
- Ranking Physicians Based on Cost May Be Misleading, Says Study
