Docs Spend About $31B Haggling with Insurers Annually
Physicians spend three hours per week–43 minutes on average per workday–haggling over claims, credentialing, authorizations, formularies, and other issues with health insurance plans, according to a study released today in Health Affairs.
The Costs to Physician Practices of Interactions with Health Insurance Plans found that total staff interaction time systemwide converted to dollars equaled $21-$31 billion annually–an average of more than $68,000 per physician per year.
"These data are yet another indicator of the dire need to streamline healthcare administration for physician practices," says William F. Jessee, MD, president and CEO of Medical Group Management Association, which sponsored the study.
The study found that primary care physicians spend more time dealing with health plans than specialists. Nursing staff spend nearly four hours per physician per day interacting with plans; and clerical staff average 7.2 hours per day. Solo practitioners and their staffs spend up to 50% more time interacting with health plans than physicians in larger practices. Non-physicians' staff time did not vary significantly by specialty.
Douglas Henley, MD, executive vice president and CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians, says he's not surprised that primary care physicians and their staff spend the most time haggling with insurers. "It's because of the diversity of their practices compared with subspecialty colleagues," Henley says. "It's a huge burden for the whole system but particularly for primary care."
Henley says some physician interactions with insurers save money elsewhere in the system with issues like pre-certification, "but a large chunk of those dollars are for an unnecessary administrative burden that could clearly be streamlined."
Most primary care physicians contract with several health insurance companies, Henley says, and each company may offer five or six different coverage plans. "What is the copay? What is the deductable? How much of that has been paid? What drugs are or aren't on their formulary? What are the levels or different tiers of the formulary? It's all different," Henley says."We are talking about standardizing health information technology, and we ought to be able to standardize this type of administrative complexity and get beyond it."
Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, says he can't dispute cost claims in the MGMA study "until I see what they calculated or how." However, he says, AHIP is sympathetic to providers' concerns about the complicated, time-consuming, and expensive administrative processes that he says also waste money and time for health plans.
"This is not by any means a one-sided issue," Zirkelbach says. "Everybody agrees that we have to do more in the areas of health information technology to improve efficiencies and make the system work better for everyone involved."
In response to this issue, MGMA wants a three-step reform plan that Jessee says could save about $40 billion annually.
The MGMA recommendations include:
- Promulgation of a national health plan identifier regulation by HHS, which would simplify and improve healthcare transaction routing and save an estimated $8.8 billion annually
- Promulgation of national electronic claim attachment regulation, which would eliminate lost paper claims, accelerate the adjudication process, and eliminate the costs associated with filing and mailing paper documents, saving $9.4 billion annually
- Standardize machine-readable patient ID cards, which would reduce claims errors and administrative costs, and eliminate many costs associated with paper records for a savings of $22.2 billion annually
The study classified interactions with health plans as authorization, formulary, claims/billing, credentialing, contracting, and quality data. Of those interactions, practices spend the most time dealing with formularies: physicians spend 1.3 hours per week and nursing staff spend 3.6 hours per physician per week. Primary care physicians spend the most time--1.7 hours weekly--on formulary issues. Physicians and their staffs spend the least amount of time on submitting or reviewing quality data.
Henley says the problem could get worse if Medicare adopts reforms that will install the same administrative requirements as the private plans, such as for pre-certification. "If they subdivide that in certain way, that could create an additional and unnecessary administrative burden," he says.
Zirckelbach says the health insurance industry is pushing for standardization and uniformity in information exchange and administrative procedures to "help physicians to interact with all of the health plans they contract with. This is an area that we have prioritized," he says.
The survey includes responses from 1,310 primary care physicians, 580 specialists, and administrators from 629 group practices. The study does not distinguish between the interactive time spent with public and private health plans.
John Commins is an editor with HealthLeaders Media. He can be reached at jcommins@healthleadersmedia.com.
- Sebelius Lashes Out at Anthem for Premium Increases
- 10 Ways to Improve Handoffs in Your Hospital
- Nurse Anesthetists Say They Practice Safely Without Physician Supervision
- There are Big Bucks in Better Patient Flow
- Doctors Sue To Stop Unsupervised Nurse Anesthetists from Administering Anesthesia
- CT Hospital was Prepared for Power Plant Explosion
- Can Nurses Drive Health Reform?
- Expectant Moms, The White House is Calling
- Texas nurse to stand trial for reporting doctor
- Millions of H1N1 Doses Will Expire on Feb. 15

Anonymous (5/15/2009 at 1:53 PM)
It's about time someone discussed this issue with numbers. The arcane, byzantine, and impossible sets of various rules created by the insurance industry is designed to tie up claims until your sick of filing and give up. It's designed to discourage you from refiling, so you will never fight, because it is so expensive to haggle, that you will just role over. The insurance industry people have perpetrated a fraud on medical providers, and then they turn around and tell their clients that the doctor did something wrong with the claim and that's why they are stuck with a bill - all the while refusing to tell the provider how to follow the confusing and elaborate rules. Come on, it's time to finally end the rip offs by the insurance thieves!
bil criteser (5/15/2009 at 1:34 PM)
I find much value in what you say, however, some clarification is needed on this article. First, much of what you speak of is not done by the physician, thereby increasing the dollars represented. Second, whose issue is being debated? Physician errors? Staff errors? payor errors? I know your article only represents the provider side, and that is who the magazine represents. But the subject also represents oppurtunities to reduce wasted time. Office staff should be better trained, medical coding should be better understood to reduce billing errors and insurance companies should provide better access for this type of assistance(some do better than others). -- bil
anonymous (5/15/2009 at 11:02 AM)
My husband has been a primary care physician for over 35 years. Schooled at Ivy League institutions, he has finally decided to take matters into his own hands. In January, he will open up his direct patient care practice (conceirge.) With over 1,000 patients (and counting) agreeing to see him in this new model, it isn't just the doctors who are gulping for air. Patients are tired of the obstacles, too. Just last night, at 7:30 pm, a patient called my husband on his cell phone. A pre-auth was not completed by his office staff in time, and the patient was informed by the insurance company that she would not be allowed to see a cardiac surgeon the next day. Fearing a $500 charge, the patient was scared. My husband assured her that he will make sure she gets the preauth. The question is, what is the priority? Cost or access to care, in a patient who demonstrates medical necessity to see a cardiac surgeon? As far as costs associated with the administration of health plans, his beat the $68K by 3 times because his volume is above average. As a top producer, the 65% overhead that falls on his shoulders (in part due to ineffective medical group management and governance structure, as well as paying for health plan administrative support) is a primary driver for making things simpler: get out of the insurance nighmare altogether - and create the time to focus entirely on patient care. Oh - and what was my husband's comment to me after that phone call last night? He replied "I can't wait until January when I don't have to deal with this anymore." For this doctor, reform comes too late. Patients aren't waiting for reform either. They are both going out into a better world in January.